email exchange

I got this email the other day and it went like this:

Him:
"I'm looking for a discreet, no strings attached purely physical relationship. Would you be interested?"

So I went to look at his profile. He was a 20 something good looking young man in Ivy League grad school. And it said that he was looking to meet a good woman and he was a philosophy major and he was looking for an intelligent woman with similar interests to have a deep and meaningful relationship with. So I responded with:

Me:

"you like to "engage in higher level thinking and actions" such as picking up strangers on match.com for random sex?"

So he said:

"Very good point. Actually I enjoy random sex with sluts, and do attend higher or deeper level activities with high quality women. So I do both to be honest. I think I'm normal to want to satisfy my physical urges."

and she said:

"and you are so worthy of those quality women. and thanks for calling me a slut. right back at ya."

And then he apologized wrote me this articulate and well worded email and said that I was apparently one of the quality women instead of the sluts and asked me out to dinner to make it up to me.

And I said no because I did not appreciate him dichotomizing women into two categories: sluts and quality and no thank you. How come women only get to be these two categories and he can sleep with the "sluts" and not be slutty himself, because he is a man, and then feel as if he is worthy of a "quality" woman?

And he waited a few days and wrote back and said that he had been thinking about what I said and that I was right and would I please, please, please go out with him, I can be right about everything.





What. The. Hell.





I can't get a date so badly that I join match.com and the ones who I tell to go to Hell beg me to go out with them. I think I need to write back that psychologist of a few posts ago and ask why? why? why?
Maybe I need to go back to 6th grade technique and be meanest to the one I like the most.